Whither The CCTV IPCC?

I asked this last week as I couldn’t believe there were no CCTV cameras in that area, I looked on Google streetview and flickr to see if any pics proved it but none were conclusive and as the last time I was in that locale was about ten years ago filming I needed a more up to date knowledge. Anyway, there are and the IPCC um, well it’s incompetence or lying, take your pick, and whether either was in the service of helping the police, again make up your own mind. Of course if the IPCC are relying on the police to obtain the footage…well looks like they steadfastly wish to avoid learning anything from past disappearances of CCTV footage where police killings were concerned.


Hardwick said on Thursday there was no CCTV evidence of alleged police assaults on Tomlinson. “We don’t have CCTV footage of the incident,” he told Channel 4 news. “There is no CCTV footage – there were no cameras in the locations where he was assaulted.”

This morning the IPCC initially stood by Hardwick’s claims. “Mr Hardwick said there was no available CCTV footage of the incident and we stand by that. Any footage that is available, whether taken by police or by the public, will be fully investigated as and when it becomes available,” it said.

However, at 10.30am, after pictures were published showing cameras in the area, the IPCC changed its stance. “At this point, Mr Hardwick believed that he was correct in this assertion – we now know this may not be accurate,” the IPCC said in a statement. “There are cameras in the surrounding area.”

The IPCC would not comment on why, almost two weeks after Tomlinson’s death and one week after it said its investigators had pieced together his last moments by looking at “many hours of CCTV”, Hardwick had been mistaken about the locations of cameras.

8 Responses to “Whither The CCTV IPCC?”

  1. otto Says:

    SHOCKA! Friendly Brit bobbies caught telling porkies!

    “Ohh, it’s not like it sued to be round here, is it Ethel?”

    “Oooh Madge, you’re right there, duck.”

  2. otto Says:

    *sued = used

    (though it might be a Freudian slip of the foreskin …SORRY!…TONGUE!)

  3. libhomo Says:

    This reminds me of how the NYPD arrests people on false charges when they videotape police misconduct.

    • RickB Says:

      Basic negotiation tactic, gives them some capital to head off the complaint, of course it is ethically reprehensible for some odd reason we expect the police not to be criminals, weird huh?

  4. ralfast Says:

    Who watches the watchmen?


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: