Bush Refused To Back Israeli Attack On Iran

Israel gave serious thought this spring to launching a military strike on Iran’s nuclear sites but was told by President George W Bush that he would not support it and did not expect to revise that view for the rest of his presidency, senior European diplomatic sources have told the Guardian.

The then prime minister, Ehud Olmert, used the occasion of Bush’s trip to Israel for the 60th anniversary of the state’s founding to raise the issue in a one-on-one meeting on May 14, the sources said. “He took it [the refusal of a US green light] as where they were at the moment, and that the US position was unlikely to change as long as Bush was in office”, they added.

The sources work for a European head of government who met the Israeli leader some time after the Bush visit. Their talks were so sensitive that no note-takers attended, but the European leader subsequently divulged to his officials the highly sensitive contents of what Olmert had told him of Bush’s position.

Bush’s decision to refuse to offer any support for a strike on Iran appeared to be based on two factors, the sources said. One was US concern over Iran’s likely retaliation, which would probably include a wave of attacks on US military and other personnel in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as on shipping in the Persian Gulf.

The other was US anxiety that Israel would not succeed in disabling Iran’s nuclear facilities in a single assault even with the use of dozens of aircraft. It could not mount a series of attacks over several days without risking full-scale war. So the benefits would not outweigh the costs.

Jonathan Steele also mentions the possibilties that I too have pondered but now are we in the clear?

Bush’s refusal to support an attack, and the strong suggestion he would not change his mind, is likely to end speculation that Washington might be preparing an “October surprise” before the US presidential election. Some analysts have argued that Bush would back an Israeli attack in an effort to help John McCain’s campaign by creating an eve-of-poll security crisis.

Others have said that in the case of an Obama victory, the vice-president, Dick Cheney, the main White House hawk, would want to cripple Iran’s nuclear programme in the dying weeks of Bush’s term.

After all the Bush crime family seem to have settled for a huge robbery (and the 700 billion figure is made up, which means in the end it will be way fucking more) rather than another war…oh except for this-

(Reuters) – U.S. and Pakistani ground forces exchanged fire across the Afghanistan-Pakistan border on Thursday after two U.S. military helicopters were shot at from a Pakistani border post, U.S. officials said.

3 Responses to “Bush Refused To Back Israeli Attack On Iran”

  1. War Pimps Broke « Ten Percent Says:

    […] over how to fleece the public the blockade of Iran attempt looks to be dead. This combined with the gossip Bush actually chilled out on Israeli plans to attack Iran looks like imperial overstretch, reality and domestic greed have beaten out […]

  2. libhomo Says:

    I worry that this is disinformation intended to reassure people wrongly that the Bush regime doesn’t plan to attack Iran in the 11/08-1/09 time frame.

  3. RickB Says:

    Yes there is that possibility, Jim Lobe talks about that http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=44031
    AIPAC & co looking for a lame duck pass. But politically if they don’t use it before the election I doubt they will have the appetite after.
    I hope it’s accurate and not a mislead.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: