Ex SAS Soldier Reveals Extent Of Torture

Throughout my time in Iraq I was in no doubt that individuals detained by UKSF and handed over to our American colleagues would be tortured. During my time as member of the US/UK Task Force, three soldiers recounted to me an incident in which they had witnessed the brutal interrogation of two detainees. Partial drowning and an electric cattle prod were used during this interrogation and this amounted to torture. It was the widely held assumption that this would be the fate of any individuals handed over to our America colleagues. My commanding officer at the time expressed his concern to the whole squadron that we were becoming “the secret police of Baghdad”.

Via Lenin. Here are excerpts of the statement read by Ben Griffin, ex-SAS soldier, at a press conference on Monday 25 February 2008-

Our government would have us believe that our involvement in the process known as Extraordinary Rendition is limited to two occasions on which planes carrying detainees landed to refuel on the British Indian Ocean Territory, Diego Garcia.

The use of British Territory and airspace pales into insignificance in light of the fact that it has been British soldiers detaining the victims of Extraordinary Rendition in the first place. Since the invasion of Afghanistan in the autumn of 2001 UKSF has operated within a joint US/UK Task Force. This Task Force has been responsible for the detention of hundreds if not thousands of individuals in Afghanistan and Iraq. Individuals detained by British soldiers within this Task force have ended up in Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp, Bagram Theatre Internment Facility, Balad Special Forces Base, Camp Nama BIAP and Abu Ghraib Prison.

Whilst the government has stated its desire that the Guantanamo Bay detention camp be closed, it has remained silent over these other secretive prisons in Iraq and Afghanistan. These secretive prisons are part of a global network in which individuals face torture and are held indefinately without charge. All of this is in direct contravention of the Geneva Conventions, International Law and the UN Convention Against Torture.

Early involvement of UKSF in the process of Extraordinary Rendition centres around operations carried out in Afghanistan in late 2001. Of note is an incident at the Qalai Janghi fortress, near Mazar-i-Sharif. UKSF fought alongside their US counterparts to put down a bloody revolt by captured Taliban fighters. The surviving Taliban fighters were then rendered to Guantanamo Bay.

After the invasion of Iraq in 2003 this joint US/UK task force appeared. Its primary mission was to kill or capture high value targets. Individuals detained by this Task Force often included non-combatants caught up in the search for high value targets. The use of secret detention centres within Iraq has negated the need to use Guantanamo Bay whilst allowing similar practice to go unnoticed.

As UK soldiers within this Task Force a policy that we would detain individuals but not arrest them was continually enforced. Since it was commonly assumed by my colleagues that anyone we detained would subsequently be tortured this policy of detention and not arrest was regarded as a clumsy legal tool used to distance British soldiers from the whole process.

During the many operations conducted to apprehend high value targets numerous non-combatants were detained and interrogated in direct contravention of the Geneva Convention regarding the treatment of civilians in occupied territories. I have no doubt in my mind that non-combatants I personally detained were handed over to the Americans and subsequently tortured.

The joint US/UK Task Force has broken International Law, contravened The Geneva Conventions and disregarded the UN Convention Against Torture. British soldiers are intimately involved in the actions of this Task Force. Jack Straw, Margaret Beckett David Miliband, Geoff Hoon, Des Browne, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown. In their respective positions over the last five years they must know that British soldiers have been operating within this joint US/UK task force. They must have been briefed on the actions of this unit.

5 Responses to “Ex SAS Soldier Reveals Extent Of Torture”

  1. UK Court Gags Ben Griffin, SAS Torture Whistleblower « Ten Percent Says:

    […] February 29, 2008 — RickB Ben Griffin who made this speech, excerpted here on the 27th has been silenced by the British establishment- A former SAS soldier was served with a high court […]

  2. Seahorse Says:

    After 3 days of relentless, wall-to-wall propaganda from the media on the subject of “Hero Harry’s adventures in the Middle East”, I wondered what piece of bad news the government (and their media) were trying to bury. Maybe it was the mounting evidence that they have been up to their necks in torture and rendition. Good luck to Ben Griffin and all the other soldiers trying to get their voices heard.

  3. RickB Says:

    Hi Seahorse, thanks for commenting. Yep the Royal fuss did help make this story vanish and played a larger role re-igniting support for the wars, which is something our Royal family often do (I often think WW1 was to some extent a row among the ruling classes of Europe -and fear of revolutions- which the ‘common’ people had to die in their millions to resolve, yeah thanks blue blooded wankers).
    From the video Ben does suggest this is a gathering storm of testimony that can not be denied. There are also the winter soldier testimonies to come in America
    http://ivaw.org/wintersoldier
    so expect many more counter strategies from the pro-war establishment.

  4. j Says:

    hi…never mind rendition..we do not have capital punishment in the UK.So what about our involvement in the handing over of prisoners in Iraq for execution.I am not interested in local customs.No EU goverment can be involved in establishing any kind of political aparatus in any other country that involves capital punishment.
    we removed saddam,to supposedly repace it with civilised democracy in align with our own.Not some hang em hang banana republic.

  5. RickB Says:

    Hi j again!
    Yes, I think the moral case is clear, I don’t know what the legal side is and certainly the occupation has done its utmost to muddy the water. Sovereignty and jurisdiction seem mutable depending on the situation. And they would not be hanging people without occupation approval, so…I think they are basically doing whatever they can get away with and the law is trailing far behind. Such is war and rule by force. If we could enforce EU human rights law on our leaders that might stop this but so far it is clear the pro-war elite are above the law which says some very damning things about the state of our civilisation.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: