Priceless

And now a news report with added comments from Archbishop Olly Garrke of the Church of the Free Market for your reading pleasure-

Fears are mounting that many Wall Street banks and financial firms will refuse to participate in the US government’s $700bn bail-out package, leaving global markets and world economies in a perilous state for months to come. ‘There is a growing feeling that banks … might instead decide to tough it out,’ said Thomas Caldwell, chairman and CEO of Caldwell Financial, a $1bn-plus fund manager.

For the past two weeks all eyes in the market have been focused on US Congress and its attempts to pass Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s bail-out package – a bill to allow the US government to buy up to $700bn of toxic mortgage-related assets from American banks, which would in theory free the credit markets and set the gears of global commerce spinning once more.

Last Monday, after the bill was thrown out by the House of Representatives, more than $1 trillion was wiped off the value of US stocks as the market was gripped by panic. The bill was passed on Friday afternoon, however, after the inclusion of $149bn of tax breaks and strict rules for participating banks. But Wall Street analysts, believe the addition of so many terms to the bill might deter potential participants.

{Hahahahahahahahahaha, how dare you not do exactly as we say, for fuck’s sake our guy Hank gave you our 3 page ransom note, yet you quibbled? This is a negotiation and we used fear, threats of martial law, cats & dogs living together to aid our side, and even the cosmetic and advisory limitations are not acceptable, how dare you! Still it’s great we chatter about these fripperies, it stops anyone talking about the institutional, structural and ideological changes necessary, it’s like setting preconditions on talks with countries you want to attack, sweet misdirection for the rube-ulace.}

One of the least attractive elements is a section designed to curb executive pay at banks that participate in the bail-out package. These include limiting stock-related pay and banning ‘golden parachutes’ for executives.

‘I think this hodge-podge of regulations and rules will be enough to put many [chief executives] off participating,’ Caldwell said.

{At this point our greed is an out of control addiction that we will do anything to enable, and by ‘anything’ yes that does include having you all gassed in Blackwater camps (which incidentally you will have paid for, hahahahhahaha), so fucking behave untermenschen}

Sources close to Goldman Sachs and Merrill Lynch indicated the banks might choose not to participate in the bail-out as there is a growing view on Wall Street that the market may be bottoming out.

Analysts also believe that the mere presence of the government as buyer of last resort will be enough to get credit markets moving again, and that a large number of banks would not need to take part for the legislation to succeed.

{We’ve seen we can blag an ass load of cash out of you and flog you our worthless debts, that is encouraging, now watch as we concentrate the toxic shit in throw away banks we sacrifice to the bailout ‘oversight’ with its virtually non existent regulations that nevertheless we abhor and refuse to even entertain their mere suggested presence. Meanwhile we will get richer and the recession will still come, but we don’t care, did I not mention we will get richer? Now fuck off while we get our marketing department, I think you call them ‘political parties’ to say – ooh look we’ll have to tighten our belts, balance the budget, healthcare, schools, welfare- I don’t think so! Keep gossiping about Palin suckers. Kerching!}

8 Responses to “Priceless”

  1. libhomo Says:

    It’s interesting. The litigious nature of the US could come to bite the executives if they refused to participate. If shareholders lost their investments due to a company going belly up after refusing to accept the bailout, those shareholders might have legal recourse against the Board of Directors and CEO.

  2. opit Says:

    This is ‘priceless’ – the other is Monopoly Money – right from the Source!
    http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=UC31Oudc5Bg

  3. RickB Says:

    GLH- didn’t Bushco limit class action suits some time back? And it might be nice if it happened but even now the paper trail is so obscure the ability to hold people to account to the level necessary in law seems to be difficult, still pissed off shareholders might have more chance than the toothless -after 8 years of Bush- regulators.

    Opit- Bird & Fortune, yes brilliant, I’m not sure it’s satire anymore they seem really to be just documenting reality and the kind of people who are getting away with this nonsense.

  4. libhomo Says:

    GLH: Bushco did not limit shareholder lawsuits because Bush and Cheney want to be able to sue Boards and CEOs of companies they own stock in. Any company that, for instance, did something environmentally sound that reduced profits, would be subject to shareholder litigation.

    The limits in class action suites apply to suits of the little people.

  5. libhomo Says:

    Oops: meant rickb

    Sigh, anyway…

    Opit: Most Americans forget that Monopoly was created to promote trust busting.

  6. RickB Says:

    “Any company that, for instance, did something environmentally sound that reduced profits, would be subject to shareholder litigation”
    Ah yes, that makes sense for them.

  7. ralfast Says:

    Guns or butter, you can have one but not both. And you can shoot children with guns but you can’t feed them lead.

  8. RickB Says:

    You could beat them to death with big butter bats but it would have to be pretty cold to work.


Leave a Reply