Just got the email, yet another No. 10 petition ignored, clearly these things are designed to give the illusion of particpatory democracy, use up that energy, misdirect it and thus protect the unaccountable intentions of the establishment, here is what the official response says-
Thank you for signing the e-petition about 7 July bombings.
The Government understands the feelings of the survivors and relatives of those killed in the 7 July bombings. Our aim is to ensure that other families do not suffer the hurt, loss and pain caused by such attacks and that is why the protection of our people against future attack remains our top priority.
The Government remains of the opinion that a public inquiry is not required into the events of the 7 July 2005. There are processes currently underway which will address many aspects of the 7 July attacks:
Criminal proceedings in connection to the bombings have been brought and pursued. Three people have recently been charged with conspiracy to cause explosions and are currently awaiting trial. The police investigation into the 7 July 2005 bombings continues.
The inquests into the deaths of all those who died have yet to take place. Proceedings stand adjourned because of the criminal proceedings outlined above.
At the end of the Crevice trial in April 2007, the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) were asked by the Prime Minister to re-appraise themselves of the information at their disposal – in particular, in relation to new information that emerged during the Crevice trial.
It remains the case that there was no prior intelligence that an attack was to be carried out on 7 July 2005. I can reassure you that the Police and Security Service would have done everything possible to prevent such an attack had any such intelligence been available. As highlighted by the Crevice investigation, the threat we face is complex. The presence of Shehzad Tanweer and Mohammad Siddique Khan in the periphery of the investigation of 2004 shows the scale and complex nature of the real and serious threat we face.
Well fuck you very much, not only do they deny an inquiry they use the refusal as a chance to peddle their misinformation. So let us now conclude:- bullshit rejection of a public inquiry has backfired. This only increases the calls for a public enquiry for accountability and for the government to admit their support of Bush’s murderous imperial adventurism put us in this danger. After that; remorse, apologies and making it right, a public enquiry is but one part of that. That would be for a government that was democratically accountable to us citizen’s, that it doesn’t happen tells you about the real dynamic of power that exists. And that’s a poisonous harvest to be sowing.
Update: Davide Simonetti who proposed the petition has a full breakdown at The Nether World (he kindly put a link to me but this is not mere polite reciprocating, he knows his stuff) of the government’s response and picks it apart lie for lie, obfuscation for obfuscation. There is no good way of turning down an inquiry but of the many ways it could be done this burbling pol speak nonsense is by far the worse. NuLabour excel at this corporate bilge-speak, somehow the gravity of the issue does not impinge on them, shameless bullshitting shiny suited wankers. And all the way through, that popular corporate myth of good faith, as if everyone was trying to be the best public servant they could be, not the responsibility evading, warmongering, mendacious little careerist establishment toerags they actually are.


















3 January, 2008 at 9:29 pm
Well what a surprise!! Once again New Labour shows how it is more concerned with covering its arse than protecting the people it’s supposed to represent. I’ve posted a response to that lame answer on the Downing Street website
3 January, 2008 at 10:14 pm
Hey Davide, sorry they rejected it, but yeah this is about par for the course. I do believe we will get an enquiry, it might be 20 years from now (which is often the way once all those concerned are comfortably retired/dead/ or otherwise out of jeopardy of serious censure). This would have been a real chance for Gordon to be different and -like you say- work for us. And politician’s always talk about trust, this is a chance to earn some, he blew it. And I think they have sabotaged their own epetition idea, although I’m sure they kept a record of all the citizen’s who engaged with the project, before promptly losing it on a misplaced CD.
27 February, 2008 at 2:11 pm
vão tomar nos cuzões poderosas de palestinas pedofilias,hugo chavez gay,evo morales maconheiro do inferno,josé sarney bigode corrupto,cornos portugueses e Mahmoud Ahmadinejad corno gay.
hamas hilter palestinos são bandos de pedofilias feitas explorações dos infantis(tv infantis),hamas nas bundas!!!!!!
27 February, 2008 at 5:17 pm
Damn my lousy language skills, erm I get the impression you are passionate about positions I might disagree with, perhaps…um help!
27 February, 2008 at 7:14 pm
My Portuguese is not that good, but I can tell you that this man holds no love the Palestinian cause (calling them Hitler like and pedophiles) and does like left-wing figures in South America. My guess is that this fellow is a right-wing extremist, the like of which killed so many of his fellows during the Brazilian civil war.
27 February, 2008 at 7:25 pm
Thanks Rafael, I hoped you might come by (maybe I need a Raf signal like Batman) , yeah I got that drift (he calls lot’s of people gay -he thinks that is an insult- Morales a mary jane fiend and various sundry paedophiles, I’m guessing alcohol may have be involved) but didn’t want to cause an international incident! Links to a football site, so not unknown for football mobs as a home for extreme right wingers.
27 February, 2008 at 9:35 pm
An ugly rant in any language is still ugly.
27 February, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Word.
22 September, 2008 at 8:45 am
[...] to start as we mean to go on, how about public inquiries into the Iraq war and the July 7 bombings? You know, if you’re really bothered about lifting veils, explaining more, and hiding [...]