390 CIA Torture Flights In Germany Alone

When air traffic controllers hear the code words “ATFM exempt,” they know to expect something drastic. Airlines use the code to report a flight when it has sick or severely injured passengers — or heads of state — on board. The code is the air-traffic equivalent of flashing blue lights on a city street.

On July 19, 2002, a Gulfstream business jet took off from Frankfurt am Main bound for Amman, Jordan. The flight received an ATFM exempt, although it carried neither patients nor politicians. Instead, the jet was carrying a CIA team that took a Mauritanian terrorism suspect into custody a short time later and eventually flew him to Guántánamo.

This camouflaging of an illegal kidnapping as a rescue flight was no isolated incident. SPIEGEL has obtained complete lists of the flight plans of secret CIA flights in German airspace, which reveal 390 takeoffs and landings of CIA aircraft at airports in Germany between 2002 and 2006. The documents also show that mis-identifying the flights was part of a system designed to dodge compliance with complicated approval regulations.

These deceptive maneuvers by the CIA have become the subject of intense scrutiny and debate within German political circles — from the Ministry of Transportation and the LBA to the Chancellery. Soon a parliamentary committee set up to investigate the German foreign intelligence agency (or BND) will also take up the matter. On Thursday the committee appointed Joachim Jacob, a former federal data protection commissioner, as special investigator on the issue of secret CIA flights. Jacob’s job is to determine how much the German government knew about the flights, which European Council investigator Dick Marty has called a “series of illegal acts” by the CIA.

Jacob will also investigate why the German government has been so tight-lipped on the flights.  According to internal documents, former Interior Minister Otto Schily was “directly presented” in February 2005 with various press reports about US intelligence agents. At the time Bernhard Falk, the deputy head of Germany’s Federal Office of Criminal Investigation, was apparently so concerned about the questionable flights that he wrote to the interior ministry: “I recommend … that you inform your senior officials.” Falk also suggested that the reports be “made available to other departments that could be involved with such procedures or accusations.”

 Under German aviation law, the false declaration of flights is an infringement subject to fines ranging from €10,000 to €25,000. All told, the 390 CIA flights would have incurred fines of between four and 10 million euros.

So very correct of them, to add up the fines that should be imposed! It is remarkable the Germans have this level of information when here we are still far from any govt. accountability or investigation. How about all the attention given to a liar’s shitty book could be better spent finding out about Blair’s complicity. Seems our airspace is owned by the US.

9 Responses to “390 CIA Torture Flights In Germany Alone”

  1. Rafael Says:

    It helps that you can remember not one but two secret police organizations in your recent history and the horrors of govermental abuse and torture. Maybe the politicos in 10 Downing street and Parliament should be given a living tour of the Tower of London, that would shake their collective memories.

  2. RickB Says:

    There is something very british about our secrecy. I think any country with a royal family will have a certain elite contempt for the childish masses who can’t be trusted with the truth.
    To which two secret police mobs do you refer?

    (I think the only thing they’d learn from a tour of the tower would be what an awful overpriced tourist trap it is, with beardy men in fancy dress)

  3. Rafael Says:

    The Stazi and the SS of course.

  4. RickB Says:

    Oh I though you meant the UK, I was trying to narrow down our shady agencies to just two! Yes when Germany uses is history to be a vigilant place protecting humans rights it is an admirable place. The UK is way behind on this.

  5. libhomo Says:

    I always wondered if the Bush regime has dirt on Tony Blair that has been used to extort his behavior. It is difficult to understand why Blair otherwise would flush his political carrier down the toilet in order to show loyalty to people he has little in common with politically.

  6. RickB Says:

    Well I don’t think they need it, we are a client state, our nukes are really US nukes and Tony was much more a Lieberman than anyone realised. Although the BAE Saudi deal and the fund raising would provide ample blackmail material, there are huge US intel listening bases here, so…

  7. libhomo Says:

    I find it odd that Britain is such a client state for the US. I would think it would be in that country’s economic and security interests to be more independent. I think something fishy is going on.

  8. RickB Says:

    Well you’re not the only one to wonder about that, (we did only this year pay off our WW2 debts to the US and we have other loans). Also though there is this insane Anglosphere movement of white english speaking conservatives, who want the uk to ally to the US not europe. I’m not really bothered by nation states, -patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel- but being tied to an empire that has shown how corrupt it has become can’t be good, plus it always drags us rightwards politically, your big name dems are basically ‘conservative’ centrists to us. Very much like Blair. Maybe 30 years from now we’ll find out some more about this period, pictures of Blair with a goat?

  9. andreas04: close to attraction Says:

    [...] clipped from tenpercent.wordpress.com [...]


Leave a Reply